Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at LawPlatt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law2026-04-27T14:44:03Zhttps://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/feed/atom/WordPress/wp-content/uploads/sites/1201694/2021/08/cropped-favicon-32x32.jpgOn Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[How deployment affects your parental rights]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480242026-04-27T14:44:03Z2026-04-27T14:44:03ZProtection from permanent changes
A common fear for those on active duty is the potential for an ex-spouse to use a deployment to change a custody order permanently. Fortunately, Washington law prevents this. The court cannot use your absence due to military orders as the only reason to change a permanent parenting plan.
If your deployment requires a shift in where the children live, the court will only issue a temporary order. Once you return home, you have 10 days to notify the other parent. You then have the right to get your original schedule back after a reasonable time.
Delegating your visitation time
Military parents in Washington have a unique right that many civilians do not. If you are deployed, you can ask the court to let a family member take over your visitation time. This means your children can continue to spend time with their grandparents, a stepparent or a sibling while you are away. This delegated visitation helps maintain your children's bond with your side of the family and continue being supported during your absence.
Pausing legal proceedings
If your co-parent tries to start a legal battle while you are at sea, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) is your primary defense. This federal law allows you to pause a court case if your military duties prevent you from appearing. You have the right to focus on your mission without worrying about a judge making a final decision on your kids while you are unable to attend the hearing.
Securing your family's future
Deployment adds stress to any family, but it should not lead to the loss of your parental rights. Success in military co-parenting comes down to using the protections already in place. By setting up a clear plan before you leave, you can help ensure your children stay connected to you, no matter where your orders take you.]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[Can evidence from an illegal search be used against you?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480192026-01-22T14:19:38Z2026-01-22T14:19:38ZIf police searched you, your car, or your home, you may wonder whether the court can still use what officers found. Washington law gives you strong protections against improper searches, and those protections often exceed federal standards. Understanding how these rules work can affect how a criminal case develops.
How search protections work in Washington
Both the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution protect you from unreasonable searches, but Washington places a stronger focus on personal privacy. Police usually need a warrant issued by a judge before searching a home, vehicle, or personal property. The warrant must clearly describe the place to be searched and the items officers may seize, and courts closely examine whether officers followed those limits.
Common situations that lead to illegal searches
Illegal searches often arise during traffic stops, arrests, or unplanned home encounters with police. Officers may search a vehicle without legal justification, rely on unclear consent, or enter a residence without a valid warrant. Even when police have a warrant, problems can arise if officers search areas not listed or seize items unrelated to the warrant’s purpose.
What happens to illegally obtained evidence
Washington courts apply the exclusionary rule, which can prevent evidence obtained through an unlawful search from being used in court. Judges may suppress the evidence after reviewing how police conducted the search and whether it complied with constitutional requirements. When suppressed evidence plays a major role in the case, prosecutors may reassess how they proceed.
Why these issues matter early in a case
Search issues usually come up early through motions asking the court to suppress evidence. Judges review police reports, witness testimony, and available recordings to decide whether officers acted lawfully. While an illegal search does not automatically end a case, it can significantly change its direction and your legal options.]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[Should you consider collaborative divorce?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480182025-10-23T15:40:18Z2025-10-23T15:40:18ZHow collaborative divorce works
Collaborative divorce involves a series of steps that couples must follow to ensure an out-of-court settlement:
A couple discusses this divorce approach to see if both parties agree.
Each party hires an attorney to work on terms regarding property division, child custody, spousal support and military benefits.
Both parties provide the necessary financial information.
Both parties and their attorneys enter into negotiations.
Both parties sign a settlement agreement, which will be presented to the judge.
For a collaborative divorce to be possible, you and your spouse must be willing to work together.
Benefits of choosing collaboration
Military divorces tend to be more complicated because of unique challenges. Couples face deployment and relocation, which often lengthen a traditional litigation process.
If you and your spouse experience these, a collaborative divorce may be the right choice. This option offers faster resolution and settlement, while helping you save money. Additionally, collaboration fosters a healthy relationship between parties, which can make a difference in navigating co-parenting.
Things to consider before taking action
While collaborative divorce can provide an amicable and fair end to your marriage, it still has complexities. Consider online research on how this option works for military families to get an idea of what to expect. Consulting an attorney can also give you helpful insights into how collaboration can settle your marriage’s unique circumstances.]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[What are the different types of gun crimes?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480172025-07-23T22:42:15Z2025-07-23T22:42:15ZGun crimes in Washington State cover a range of offenses related to the unlawful possession, use, or trafficking of firearms. Understanding these offenses helps you navigate the state's legal landscape regarding firearms.
Unlawful possession of firearms
Washington law prohibits certain individuals from owning or possessing firearms. Unlawful possession can be classified into two degrees: first-degree unlawful possession and second-degree unlawful possession.A first-degree unlawful possession offense occurs when an individual possesses a firearm after being convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity for a serious offense, such as assault or robbery. The law classifies this as a Class B felony, and a conviction can result in up to 10 years in prison and fines up to $20,000.With second-degree unlawful possession, this charge applies when a person possesses a firearm after being convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity for specific felonies or certain domestic violence-related crimes. The law treats this offense as a Class C felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and fines up to $10,000.
Carrying a concealed firearm without a license
In Washington, carrying a concealed firearm without a valid concealed pistol license (CPL) is a misdemeanor offense. A conviction can result in up to 90 days in jail and fines up to $1,000.
Trafficking in firearms
Engaging in the business of selling firearms without a license or selling firearms to individuals prohibited from owning them constitutes firearm trafficking. This offense carries severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines.
Prohibited weapons
Washington State bans several dangerous weapons, including:
Machine guns
Short-barreled rifles and shotguns
Automatic and assault weapons
Silencers and suppressors
Explosives and destructive devices
Certain knives and switchblades
Possessing or manufacturing these prohibited weapons is a Class C felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and fines up to $10,000.Understanding these offenses helps you comply with Washington State's firearm laws. Engaging in any of these activities can result in serious legal consequences.]]>by Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[You MIGHT be an “Illegal Alien” if…..]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480162025-06-30T16:12:38Z2025-06-30T16:12:38Zunderlying subject-matter legal issues related to the recent Supreme Court Decision about the “reach” of local Federal District Courts, in this case as it applies to Birthright Citizenship cases. This blurb does not really address that jurisdictional issue, the validity of universal injunctions, the issue the Supreme Court was actually talking about this week. That issue is complicated, and I am not sure where I stand on it, to be frank. Not simple.
This new SCOTUS ruling is all about whether “nationwide injunctions” are valid, simply put. Their analysis would apply equally to litigation brought by ANYONE, not only by a specific administration. I know that it was a concern of some of the Dems too. The concept applies to any and all such litigation, regardless of who brought it (i.e. The same analysis applies to ALL sides of the political spectrum.) This is how law really works, versus how non-lawyers think it works or want it to work.
This jurisdictional decision has zero to do with the underlying substantive legal issue (birthright citizenship). The recent SCOTUS opinion is only about Jurisdiction and the reach of the local courts’ authority. It has nothing to do with the underlying issues. That is a totally different legal analysis.
It would be like arguing that the evidence seized pursuant to an illegal Search Warrant should not be suppressed because the Defendant is Guilty of Murder. Guilt is not relevant to the legality of the warrant in any way, shape or form. If you get the warrant tossed you would never say you “won” the underlying dispute. There is still a trial to be tried. So.... the underlying “matter in dispute” (Birthright Citizenship) is 100% irrelevant to whether the court has the power to order the entire country to do or not do something with a “universal injunction”, .....but that belongs in its own blog. Suffice to say, the fact that people think it does shows that they are either 1. Not Lawyers or 2. Did not go to Stanford Law. 🤷♂️ Maybe Stetson Law School, whatever that is.
This post is about the actual substantive issues in the Birthright Citizenship analysis, not about jurisdiction. Similar but TOTALLY FRIGGIN’ DIFFERENT! At least to actually competent and honest lawyers.
The underlying issue at hand could be Birthright Citizenship or Capital Murder or whether Red Dye #2 in jelly beans should be banned all over the country by a local Federal District Court. If that confuses you are either not a lawyer (or not a very good one). Sorry.........Here goes nothin’....
*I'm really worried I.C.E. might come for me next.
You see, I'm descended from “illegal aliens”, who showed up in America with no passports, killed the locals, stole their food and land, and then proceeded to take over the entire country by force, raping and pillaging as they went.**
So, I’m worried that the Executive Order recently issued by Trump to attempt to end “birthright citizenship” may officially make me one of the “Illegals”. That’s because the order, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” states that a child born in the U.S. must have at least one parent who is either a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident to automatically become a U.S. citizen.
The problem is that I'm a Mayflower Descendant. My people showed up, uninvited, a century and a half before the United States even existed. They were the definition of illegal. So, if Trump's logic that the 14th Amendment somehow magically does not apply to you unless one or both of your parents were legal citizens..... then the offspring of those Mayflower dudes were all illegal. Their parents were all born in England. If they were illegal then so were their kids. And theirs. And it would go on and on and on over the centuries until you got to .... lil’ ol’ ME. Huh. (Better get my “go-bag” ready.)
Department of Justice lawyers essentially argued in Seattle’s Federal District Court that I am illegal because the 14th Amendment would not apply to someone who comes from such a long line of “Illegals.”
This is exactly what they said (I’m a lawyer so I like to be specific); “Ample historical evidence shows that the children of non-resident aliens are subject to foreign powers — and, thus, are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and are not constitutionally entitled to birthright citizenship.”
The idea that a member of the Bar would have the nerve to stand up in a public courtroom and make that ridiculous argument boggles my mind. Coug’s too.
Coug is some local lawyers’ nickname for Judge Coughenour. (The gh is silent btw, so it’s pronounced Coone. Do what you will with that.) I know him and have appeared in front of him and respect him. He is the Federal Judge who ruled that this order is “blatantly unconstitutional”. “This boggles my mind” is basically what he told the DOJ “lawyers” (I use the term loosely).
Coug ain’t no Liberal. Trust me. He tends to be tough on our clients. He’s kind of a “hanging judge” to be honest. A Regan appointee. The idea that he is some kind of Seattle Commie is ludicrous.
Fortunately, he’s smart. And, he knows how to read. And think. So, for now I can breathe easy. He made the right decision when he tossed the order. Still. The Feds are appealing. With our current U.S. Supreme Court that makes me a tad nervous. Some of them are pretty much in Trump’s pocket, let’s face it. Taking money from his rich cronies and flying flags supporting his MAGA domestic terrorists (Thomas and Alito to be exact). It could “be wild” if the Supremes get their hands on Coug’s opinion. Who knows what they might do. {Now, we do.}
For now, all I have is a question. Am I illegal or not? The answer to that question is in the hands of the Department of “Justice” and the Courts at this point. I just hope that real justice prevails. If not? A whole bunch of us “blue-bloods” need to get ready to move back home, to England, where I guess I belong.
**HOPEFULLY my people did not do the raping and pillaging part. But they wound up owning half of lower Manhattan so not exactly clean hands there...... (don’t ask where the money went, but I have a copy of the letter my GGGGGG-Uncle Samuel Broome sent to Tom Jefferson, asking about the close to $300K in today’s money that he lent the Continental Army and never got paid back, reminding Tom about how he promised to pay it back when they were hanging out in Paris, begging for money from the French King). But. In Federal Court my ancestors would for sure be named as Co-Conspirators. Since they 100% were, and since they clearly benefited from the crimes committed by some of their crew. That is how Conspiracies work.]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[What are Washington’s laws on paternity?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480152025-05-09T19:44:40Z2025-05-09T19:44:40ZIn Washington, you must establish paternity for child custody, child support, and other family law matters. When the father's identity is unclear or the parents are unmarried, the law offers clear steps to determine biological paternity. Understanding these laws helps protect the child's rights and well-being.
How do you establish paternity in Washington?
You can establish paternity in Washington in several ways. The most common method involves both parents signing a Voluntary Acknowledgment of Paternity (VAP) form and filing it with the state. By signing, both parents legally recognize the father as the child’s legal father, usually shortly after birth.If one parent disputes paternity or refuses to sign the VAP, the court may order a paternity test or issue a court order to establish paternity. Genetic testing provides accurate and conclusive results when a disagreement arises.
What rights do fathers gain once they establish paternity?
After you establish paternity in Washington, you gain specific rights and responsibilities. These include the right to seek custody, visitation, and participate in important decisions about the child’s upbringing.You can also request a parenting plan, which outlines custody, visitation, and decision-making authority for the child. The plan clearly defines both parents’ roles and responsibilities.
Can you challenge paternity in Washington?
Yes, Washington law allows parents to challenge paternity. If new evidence arises that questions the established paternity, you can request a court hearing. The court may order genetic testing or use other evidence to resolve paternity disputes. You must raise concerns within a specific time frame to prevent complications.If genetic testing shows that the presumed father is not the biological father, the court adjusts legal obligations accordingly.Understanding paternity laws in Washington helps you make informed decisions about your child’s future. These laws protect the child’s right to support, inheritance, and access to both parents.]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[What legal rights do minors have in Washington courts?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480142025-01-31T18:03:38Z2025-01-31T18:03:38ZThe criminal justice system treats juveniles differently than adults. Washington state enforces specific laws that protect minors and focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Understanding these rights helps families navigate the legal process more effectively.
The right to legal representation
Juveniles have the right to an attorney in all criminal proceedings. If a minor lacks the funds for legal counsel, the court must appoint a public defender. Legal representation ensures that the system respects a juvenile's rights throughout the process.
The right to remain silent
Like adults, juveniles can remain silent when questioned by law enforcement. They do not need to answer questions without an attorney or guardian present. Any statements they make can serve as evidence in court.
Parental notification and involvement
When law enforcement takes a minor into custody, they must notify a parent or guardian. A parent has the right to attend questioning. This protection prevents minors from making uninformed statements.
Protection against self-incrimination
Juveniles do not need to testify against themselves. The Fifth Amendment guarantees this right and stops authorities from forcing minors to make self-incriminating statements.
The right to a fair and speedy trial
Juveniles have the right to a hearing within a reasonable time frame. Washington state resolves juvenile cases quickly to reduce disruptions to a minor’s life. This system ensures fairness without unnecessary delays.
Alternative sentencing and rehabilitation programs
Washington's juvenile justice system prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. Instead of jail time, courts assign probation, community service, or counseling. These programs focus on education and preventing future offenses.
Record sealing opportunities
Many juveniles can seal their records, which prevents them from affecting future opportunities. Washington law allows minors to request record sealing after they complete their sentence and maintain a crime-free record for a set period.Juveniles facing criminal charges must understand their rights and options. Having a proper understanding helps protect their future and ensures fair treatment in the justice system.]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[Can your spouse file for divorce while you are away on leave?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480132024-10-30T14:23:19Z2024-10-30T14:23:19ZMilitary service can put a strain on relationships, especially when one spouse is away on leave for extended periods. If you are serving in the military and are away on leave, you may wonder if your spouse can file for divorce during that time.
Filing for divorce while you are away
Yes, your spouse can file for divorce while you are away on military leave. Being on leave does not prevent your spouse from starting the divorce process. However, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) provides some protection to military members in this situation. The SCRA allows you to request a delay in the divorce proceedings while you are on active duty or during a time when your military service affects your ability to respond to the divorce.The SCRA helps protect active-duty military members from legal actions, including divorce, that could negatively affect them while serving. If you receive divorce papers while on military leave, you can ask the court to postpone the proceedings. The court may grant a delay if your military duties prevent you from being present or properly participating in the divorce process. This protection helps ensure that you are not at a disadvantage due to your service.
Communicating with your spouse
If you believe that your spouse might file for divorce while you are on leave, try to maintain open communication. Honest discussions can help both of you understand each other's needs and decide on the best way to move forward. Clear communication can also help you prepare for any potential legal actions that may arise while you are away.
Returning home for proceedings
In some cases, it may be helpful to return home to handle the divorce process in person, if possible. While the SCRA offers protection, it might be better for both you and your spouse to resolve matters when you are available and can participate fully in the proceedings.Military service can complicate the divorce process, but there are protections in place to help. Understanding your rights under the SCRA and staying informed can help you navigate a divorce while you are away on military leave. ]]>On Behalf of Platt, Thompson and Buescher, Attorneys at Law<![CDATA[Can you refuse a field sobriety test in the state of Washington?]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480112024-08-09T19:13:37Z2024-08-09T19:13:37ZField sobriety tests are a series of exercises that police use to determine whether a driver is impaired. They can include walking a straight line, standing on one leg, and following an object with one's eyes. Police use the results to decide if they have probable cause to make an arrest. But do you have to comply with these tests?
Your right to refuse
In Washington, you have the right to refuse field sobriety tests, as you're not legally obligated to participate. However, there are consequences that come with this decision. While refusing to take the tests cannot be used against you in court, the officer may decide to arrest you based on other observations and evidence.
Consequences of refusal
Refusing a field sobriety test in Washington may lead to a DUI arrest if the officer believes there is enough evidence of impairment. Once arrested, you'll need to take a breath test at the police station. Refusing this can have serious consequences, such as mandatory license suspension and fines.
Weighing your options
When deciding whether to refuse a field sobriety test, consider the potential outcomes. If you believe you can pass the tests, cooperating may demonstrate your sobriety. However, if you have doubts or know you have been drinking, refusing may prevent you from providing evidence of impairment. It’s a judgment call that depends on the specific circumstances and your condition at the time.
Make an informed choice
If stopped for suspicion of DUI in Washington, it is crucial to remain calm and respectful. Understand your rights and the potential consequences of your decisions for the best possible outcome. ]]>by craigplatt<![CDATA[Alec Baldwin is NOT GUILTY]]>https://www.seattlecriminallawyerhelp.com/?p=480102024-07-12T21:07:28Z2024-07-12T21:07:02ZACTOR not a gun expert.
Was he supposed to check it for himself and not trust the person whose ONLY job was doing that??? While he was starring in the movie and, co-wrote it and was running the production? Are you serious? I figure he was supposed to do his three jobs and trust the incompetent armorer to do her one job.
What if the camera was not working and the shots were blurry. Would that be his fault too? What if his pants fell off in the middle of a scene because the costume people did not sew them up properly? Should he be expected to whip out a needle and thread?
I did listen to some of the questioning. It’s like a law school text book about Reasonable Doubt.
The idiot prosecutor says stupid stuff like this:
Special prosecutor Erlinda Ocampo Johnson repeatedly referred to Baldwin playing “make-believe” with a revolver on the set of the film “Rust,” and said it led to very real danger and the death of Halyna Hutchins, whom she called “a vibrant 42-year-old rising star.”
Uh..... is it just me or is acting the same thing as “playing make-believe”? What a moronic thing to say. It speaks volumes to me. Volumes of “stupid prosecutor”. I say that as a former Chief Prosecutor myself. I really wish I could be the defense lawyer on this!
My suspicion is that this is politically motivated. It’s common knowledge that Baldwin is a Leftie. How much do you want to bet the prosecutor is not? The only thing I can find out about her is that her private law office is now listed as “Permanently closed” on Google.
Gee. I wonder how much $$$ they are paying her for this stunt?
That’s it. NG.
All day.]]>